Just before we headed to church this morning I got a few photos of Jill, Marta and Meghan with Jean and John which I’ve posted over on Yahoo.
The performance was different. First was the enacted prayer which started with one of the members of the troupe asking for a prayer request or praise. Once the request was made, members of the troupe would then take on a role in that prayer and then act it out.
For example, the first prayer was for a healing. A daughter of one of the ladies is undergoing a treatment trail to deal with her cervical cancer. So Megan took the roll of the daughter, Marta was the mother (who requested the prayer) and Jill was the medical staff. Three others took the rolls of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost interacting with each of the mortals. Once it was clear who was who, the prayer would start with motion but not words. The daughter going for a test, the mother at home staying busy, the medical staff working all the while the trinity is with each in a different way until the end when the results confirm the healing… yet this is all communicated without a sound.
A prayer for the eyes that was quite moving.
Jean and I talked later about why neither of us raised our hands for a request. Jean thought of the Woods and just couldn’t put Sasha’s loss into context for them. I thought of asking for a blessing for our family as we deal with trying to have another child while dealing with the grind of life. Yet I was reminded of how many blessings I have with John and Jean and felt a bit selfish for asking for more. London has also been on my mind but again, I’ve seen too much from the BBC to want to see more. I must confess that looking back, enacted prayer has some very deep roots into the world of improv but without the jokes.
The play was in the form of three stories from II Kings. This is not a book that gets its due and the selections from it were interesting in the message that they bring. I really enjoyed the vocal and percussion that was used for a background (I do love the different sounds from a djembe) and the performances were top notch.
My one suggestion would be that of framing the stories into a context. How does this event apply to you some 2000 years later? For it is very much in the Jewish tradition (I’ve been reading a ton of books on the roots of the modern Jewish faith from my pal J over in New York) to talk about these events and to decided as a community their context. Plus it would be a great way for the actors and the worshipers to talk with each other.
Also it would be interesting to see how would these stories look in the modern world. Once I tinkered with the idea of taking the story of David and Bathsheba and placing it into a mixture of 1930’s Europe with Middle Earth. Like Julie Taymor’s Titus but much darker and tell it from Uriah’s point of view.
Oh and why did I say event rather than story? The historian in me looks at the bible in terms of events rather than stories and people rather than characters. Because events happen were a story might be made up and people existed while characters don’t. Yes I know there are things in their that are stories but this is my hang up.